1P Vibe POD Following the successes of our 1P & 1.5P VibePODs, we are pleased to showcase the designs for the 2P and 3P VibePODs which can be used to qualify 2P and 3P Pocketqube satellites. We are looking for volunteers to test these designs which would provide the pocketqube community access to a full … Continue reading New VibePODs
The Great Auk (GA) was a flightless bird which is a fitting name for the new dummy 3P pocketqube satellites. They have been developed to replace the dummy pocketqubes that were damaged during the initial functional testing of the Claymore deployer. Their mass are approximately 720g and just like as their name suggest they aren't … Continue reading All rise the Great Auk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkOFzomAOco&t=29s 1.5P VibePOD can be used to pass 1.5P Pocketqubes during random vibration testing. Has been qualified to NASA GEVS7000 in 2020 where it enabled AMSAT’s EASAT-2 1.5P and Hades satellites to pass random vibration. Dimensions w/o plate: 98mm x 96mm x 117mm. Dimension of adapter plate: 230mm x 230mm x 14mm Mass (Dry): 1.1kg … Continue reading 1.5P VibePOD
I am excited to showcase the MK1 engineering model of the Claymore 6P POD which aims to decoratise the pocketqube launch services by providing PQ teams an alternative launch service. The only things that are missing are the hold down release mechanism (HDRM), hinge pins and a replacement for the top panel since it has … Continue reading Claymore 6P Mk1
Back in December 2019 I was excited to showcase the 1p VibePOD which was used to qualify the FOSSA 1P for the Rocketlab “Running out of fingers” mission in Q4 2019. The deployer was tested to NASA GEVS7000 standards. I have decided to make the design open source and I have uploaded the STEP files, … Continue reading VibePOD 1P
Developing a set of requirements before you dive into CAD is not only good practice but necessary as you can’t determine whether your design will meet your needs if you haven’t defined them. Poor or vague requirements are also useless as they can make things difficult to define if your design is acceptable for solving … Continue reading Generating requirements by visualising the problem
Ok the title is a bit click baity and I do like to be controversial at times but in all seriousness I don’t see pocketqubes (PQ) replacing cubesats. I know this sounds a bit crazy from someone who is developing the “Claymore” a 6P pocketqube deployer. But hear me out, this isn’t necessary a bad … Continue reading Pocketqubes won’t replace cubesats
With the FEA simulations, engineering drawings and tolerance stacks complete I am waiting on the suppliers responding to my RFQ (Request for Quote) for machining the worlds lightest 6P pocketqube deployer. I will be comparing the quotes and then wil be raising an order soon. While I am waiting for their responses I have been … Continue reading Build or buy?
Currently I have almost completed the finishing touches to the 2nd iteration of my 6p POD and should have the FEA complete during the week. I have been learning how to carry out tolerance stack analysis and thought it would be good to let the pocketqube teams know about this useful tool. So why should … Continue reading Stack those tolerances!
So my 3d printed version of my 6p pocketqube deployer (need to give it a creative name) had arrived last week. While I was putting it all together I was making mental notes on how easy it was to put together, how rigid the parts were and areas for improvement. For a first attempt there … Continue reading Lessons from prototype round 1